ciaopost
← All posts
Local Social Media Growth

The Vanity Metrics That Make You Feel Busy and Poor

· 7min read · by the ciaopost team

There is one number, and no app will ever show it to you:

How many people walked in this month who had never been before — and where did they hear about you?

You get it by asking them. That is it. That is the entire analytics stack a local business needs.

Everything the app does show you — likes, reach, impressions, followers, engagement rate — can all rise steadily while your Tuesday afternoons stay empty. They are not lies. They are just measuring something that is not your business.

Why the numbers on the screen mislead you

Every metric a platform gives you is a measure of attention, and attention is what the platform sells. It is not what you sell.

A post reaching four thousand people sounds like a good week. But who were they? If they are scattered across the country, or the continent, then not one of them can walk into your salon, and the four thousand is worth precisely nothing to you. A post reaching two hundred people who all live within two kilometres is worth more, and it will look like a worse week on the screen.

The metric is not wrong. It is answering a question you did not ask: how many humans glanced at this? Your question is how many of them can get here on foot?

Optimise for the first and you will get very good at being seen by people who will never book. That is how an owner ends up feeling busy, productive, and poor.

The three that hurt the most

Followers. The classic. It grows, it feels like progress, and a follower in another country is not a customer — forty neighbours beat four thousand strangers, and every growth hack that inflates this number is inflating the wrong thing.

Likes. A like costs nothing and means nothing. People like things they will never act on, as a small politeness. A post with sixty likes and no bookings is not a successful post.

Reach. The most seductive, because it is the biggest number, and because it feels like it must eventually turn into something. It often does not — reach among people who are not in your catchment is a statistic about the internet, not about you.

What to count instead

Boringly, physically, in the shop:

  • New faces this month. Not clients, not bookings — people you have never seen before.
  • “Where did you hear about us?” Ask. Every time. Write it on a scrap of paper by the till if you have to.
  • “Did you see us on Instagram?” — and, the one that tells you the mechanism is working: “Did you see Maria’s video?”

That third one is the whole game. The day someone says “my friend Maria was in a video and I saw it on her story”, you have proof that the tag is doing its job — and no dashboard will ever tell you that.

Why the tag is the only thing worth tracking

The reason to care about this at all: almost every metric on the screen measures your reach into people who already follow you, who are mostly people who already come to you.

The one mechanism that reaches someone new is the tag. You publish a customer’s testimonial, you tag her, she gets a notification, she comments or shares it — and now three hundred people who actually know her, and mostly live near her, are looking at someone they trust saying you are good.

That is the mechanism, and its output is a new face in your shop, not a number in an app. So that is where you should be looking for the result. The tag, done properly, is the only lever with a measurable end.

The engagement trap, and what it does to your judgement

Here is the subtle damage, and it is worse than wasted time.

Once you are watching likes, you start making posts that get likes. And the things that get likes are not the things that get customers — a funny meme, a pretty sunset, a “tag a friend who needs this” will out-perform a stumbling thirty-second testimonial every time, on every metric the app shows you.

So you post more of the first and less of the second. The numbers improve. The shop does not.

You have optimised yourself into a feed that performs well and sells nothing — and you did it by following the only feedback you were given.

Do not chase the number with pressure

The last thing a metric does is make you press.

A quiet week, a flat graph, and you go looking for a testimonial to fill it. So you start asking customers who were merely satisfied, and leaning in a little when they hesitate.

That produces a lukewarm, obliging recording that should never be published. And it breaks the thing that made your testimonials worth anything: the customer who is not genuinely pleased simply does not record — she says she is in a hurry, she smiles, she goes, and the bad one is never made. That filter only functions while the no is free and you are honestly fine with it.

A metric is a very expensive reason to start pressing.

One honest month, one hypothetical barber

Picture a barber on a side street who has posted twice a week for a year. His follower count sits at nine hundred, his reach last month touched three thousand, and he could not tell you whether a single one of those people ever sat in his chair. So he tries the boring thing for four weeks. By the till he keeps a scrap of paper and asks every new face the one question.

By week four the paper reads: eleven people he had never cut before. Four came because a mate sent them. Three walked past and liked the look of the place. Two found him on Google. And two said they saw a video of a regular called Dan, on Dan’s own story. That last pair is the only line on the paper his three thousand reach had anything to do with — and it came from a single tagged testimonial, not from the follower count he had been nursing all year.

Nine hundred followers told him nothing. Eleven faces and their reasons told him everything: word of mouth is carrying the shop, and the one slice of social that pulls a stranger in is the tag, because it borrows Dan’s friends rather than his own audience. A month of scraps of paper is the only tracking a shop like this needs — it costs nothing and it cannot be gamed.

But isn’t a bigger audience better?

A fair question, and the honest answer is: only if the audience is near you. A bigger local audience is genuinely better — more of the right people see you, more of them can actually turn up. A bigger audience that is mostly strangers a hundred miles away is not a smaller version of that good thing. It is a different thing that happens to wear the same number. It costs you effort to build, it flatters the graph, and it books nobody.

So the aim is not a small audience. It is a local one. The follower who lives on your street and the follower who lives on another continent count as one apiece on the screen, and they are worth nothing like the same to you. Chase the people who can get to your door on foot and the number may climb slowly — but every point of it is a person who might walk in.

Ask, and write it down

This week: ask every new customer where they heard about you, and write it on a piece of paper.

At the end of the month you will have something no analytics dashboard can give you — a real count of the people who came, and the actual reason they came.

If Instagram is not on that list, nothing on Instagram was working, however good the graph looked.

The three things that genuinely grow a local business — and the tactics that only pretend to — is where to spend the effort instead.

Try it with your next customer.
One question, sixty seconds, published.
Try ciaopost